Pages

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Monthly Roundup: June 2015

June was a pretty uneventful month, although I (finally) made my reading goal! Hooray! I got one rejection letter, though it was for a piece that I fully expected to be sent back, and the note with it was kind. They say that if an editor takes the time to compliment your writing personally, at least there was something of merit in it, even if it doesn't fit with their needs at the time. I've got a few ideas for how to restructure that piece anyway.

Otherwise I didn't really do much for writing this month, much to my shame. We're trying to fix up our house and that's really demanded a lot of attention lately, so we'll see how the rest of the summer plays out. We took out a couple overgrown lilacs and other trees, installed some new fixtures, built a new deck and a couple other small things to improve our poor, rotted house, at least until we disturbed a colony of biting ants and had to retreat. The garden is also getting into the stage where it's slightly lower maintenance (at least until things start being ready to harvest!) so July may go a little easier.

One highlight of my month is I did get a linkback from Nnedi Okorafor on her twitter. Call me a fangirl, but I enjoyed it!

What's happening in July? Writers conferences I'm not going to, for one. Writers Digest conference is July 31st, and the Midwest Writers Workshop starts the 23rd. I'm probably not going to get to another conference until I try for Writers in Paradise again next January - what with my job being up in the air and so many things demanding money at home, it's just hard to balance the stuff I want to do with the stuff I have to do: the ever-present struggle of adulthood. Plus there's this constant feeling that these big conferences and things are just not for me, the amateur with only a couple tiny magazines under her belt. These feel like they're for people who are more advanced than I in their writing careers. Of course, I also felt the same way about Writers in Paradise, and that turned out pretty spectacular, so I may be worrying over nothing. Still, it's hard to justify the fees for some of these events given that I'm not making anything back at the current time. I'd like to advance a little more in my skills and resume before investing heavily in workshops and conferences.

Non-writerly events for July include the Dragon Festival celebrating pan-Asian heritage and spirit, and what I originally read as a scottish festival but apparently is just music with a deceiving name. Hmph. Well, just wait till August when Ren Faire and the State Fair start up. Minnesota summertime traditions, that.

Going to be enjoying this all summer, yeeeaaahhh

Thursday, June 25, 2015

His Majesty's Dragon - Naomi Novik

The Temeraire series is one I actually started a couple years back, but spotting Blood of Tyrants on the shelf at Half Price Books reminded me that I had forgotten to continue it once I caught up to (I think) Victory of Eagles. Naturally, I can't just pick up the unread books, though. My memory is so terrible that I barely remember what happened in previous books--a mixed blessing, shall we say, for though I have to remind myself of what-happened-when it does make for pleasant rereads. It's practically a new book! Ahem. Anyway, that meant that clearly, I had to restart back at the beginning. Luckily I still had most of the paperbacks still on my shelves, and they're such a quick read that it ain't no thing.

A not-particularly-accurate-to-text Temeraire. Todd Lockwood pretty much draws all dragons exactly the same.

So His Majesty's Dragon is the first book in the series, and opens with Captain Will Laurence capturing a French vessel during the Napoleonic Wars. By chance this vessel happens to be carrying a prized dragon egg, and it's close to hatching. England is so hard-up for aerial cavalry that they can't risk letting this dragon go wild, so it's up to the members of the crew to try and harness it, for the good of the nation. Naturally, it's Laurence himself who wins the prize, and his life is forever changed by the deep bond that grows between man and dragon. Laurence and Temeraire must face the prejudices of Navy, family, and Aerial Corps; rush through their training to help in the war; and learn how to navigate not only a new place in the world, but also the tricky political position of having acquired a priceless Chinese breed, which alone may be a grievous insult to the Emperor. 

Much of this book is devoted to establishing the relationship between the main pair, and to Laurence learning the differences between his old and new life. The incident that stands out the most, naturally, is that of Captain Rankin and his dragon Levitas. Laurence befriends him at first, I think grateful for anyone to show him the kindness of acquaintance, when so many aerial men treated him coldly as an interloper. But when Laurence meets poor little Levitas, the neglected and harshly-treated dragon that aches for a kind word, he doesn't make the connection between Levitas and the cold treatment of Rankin by the other aviators as well.

The way Novik portrays the dragons here are like hyper-intelligent dogs, in the sense that they seem to ache deeper than anything for the bond between them and their handlers. It's not as if Rankin, say, beats his partner, but he withholds all affection, and the way that Levitas responds is quite heartbreaking.

"Stay here quietly; I do not want to hear that you have been pestering the crew when I return," Ranking said sharply to Levitas, after dismounting; he threw the reins of his harness around a post, as if Levitas were a horse to be tethered. "You can eat when we return to Loch Laggan."
"I do not want to bother them, and I can wait to eat, but I am a little thirsty," Levitas said in a small voice. "I tried to fly as fast as I could," he added. 

I guess in this way I understand aviators like I understand dog people. Those of us who know the heartstring tug of a dog who only wants to be near you, touch you, be with you; know the same affection that flows from these dragons. I compare this kind of bond to the kind we see in, say, McCaffrey's Pern series. The dragons there are, too, separate beings, and extremely intelligent; but they also share a kind of telepathic bond, and I think the line between human and dragon gets blurred a lot. Which is not a terrible concept, but by this point (McCaffrey began writing Pern in 1967) we've seen a LOT of telepathic dragons, and it's getting a little worn. In Novik's series we spend a lot more time exploring the social effects of dragons existing: can you consider them human? Beast? Somewhere in between? Where is the line drawn? What rights do dragons inherently have? Can you very well keep them in essential slavery if you consider them sentient?

Novik's worldbuilding here also heavily reminds me of Kim Stanley Robinson's The Years of Rice and Salt. In that book, Robinson theorizes about what the world would be like the black plague had killed off nearly all of Europe's population, leaving China and Islam as the major world powers. You can tell that a lot of thought went into the building of this alternate history, thinking of how that gap in European power would lead to this effect, to this effect, and so on and so forth. Novik, similarly, has obviously placed a lot of thought into what the world would be like with these dragons as transport and weapons. In this way it's as much the setting that fascinates as the plot itself, which, I'll be entirely honest, isn't particularly mind-blowing or anything. But it's comfortable, like a warm fireplace on a rainy day. It doesn't have to excite to be pleasant.

All in all I do really enjoy this series, and while I have a tendency to do rereads of whole series every couple years (coughGameofThronescough) once the last book is out (slated 2016) I'll probably retire it in favor of new reads.

Overall: 4 stars

More reviews: His Majesty's Dragon on Librarything (Average 4.1 stars)
His Majesty's Dragon on Goodreads (Average 4.04 stars)


Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Serena - Ron Rash

I first heard about Serena via the movie with Jennifer Lawrence and Bradley Cooper. While I haven't yet gotten to see it--partly because it was apparently so poorly received that it skipped theaters entirely? Was it that bad--it did inspire me to pick up the original story that the movie was based on, by Ron Rash.


Now I don't know if this pair just really likes working together or what, but that aside, JLaw is a really odd casting choice in this for me. She always looks like she's kind of confused, or sad, or both, at any given time, and after getting to know Serena in this story I really expected her to look more coldly distantly beautiful. That said, I haven't seen her performance, so maybe she pulls it off just fine. Or maybe she doesn't, and that's why it tanked. I don't know.

Being the titular character, Serena is obviously who this story is really about. And I love her. She comes into my life at a time when I question our cultural insistence on women being likable and friendly and always accomodating, when I struggle with being authentic and standing up for my own rights. I've always been a kind of difficult person, and I pride myself on that, even when it creates difficulties in my life. Serena is raw in that way, but to a desperate extreme. She's an extremely hard, no-fucks-given I-get-mine kind of woman, and she will not tolerate disrespect of any kind, but especially that based on her gender. By all rights, you're not supposed to like her, but that's why I do. It's not often I get to see a real unlikeable female character that has such strength and drive, in a way that's more often attributed to male characters.

But naturally, Serena doesn't reach a balance in her life. Even as I admire her, I see how she will lead herself to disaster. Even given a drive for authenticity, I see the necessity of working within the confines of the culture one lives in. Serena and Pemberton run their logging camp with a hard hand, and as people pop up in their way, they kill or have them killed. They grow drunk on their own power and importance. Serena gets pregnant, miscarries--in part thanks to the buffoonery of the camp doctor--and tries to kill Pemberton's ex-lover Rachel in order to steal her child, but Rachel escapes to the West Coast with some money that Pemberton secretly has sent to her. Serena finds out, and ends up having Pemberton poisoned and left for dead as well. You don't cross Serena. The miscarriage is really like the turning point in her mental state: before it seemed she had a modicum of self restraint; after it was deaths galore. She trots off to Brazil to pursue her dream of chopping down all the Brazilian forests and becoming filthy, filthy rich.

Ultimately I think this story follows the traditional arc of the tragedy: everyone ends up sad and/or dead by the end of the book. The only people who got out in one piece is Rachel, and her illegitimate son by Pemberton. Serena gets the life she wants, sort of, but even that ends in murder.

Overall I found this story to be really enjoyable, in a dark, twisted emotional kind of way. Some of the characters maybe weren't as well-rounded as I would have liked (Rachel is very much the tormented angel, for example) and the use of loggers as a kind of chorus was an odd if interesting choice, but I enjoyed the general flow of the story.

Overall: 4 stars
Amazon: Serena

More reviews: Serena on Librarything (Average 3.71 stars)
Serena on Goodreads (Average 3.55 stars)


Thursday, June 18, 2015

Mistborn: The Final Empire - Brandon Sanderson

I bought this book, based on a Librarything recommendation, as an Audible audiobook. It was perhaps a big mistake.

I'll preface this post by saying this is possibly the first non-review review I'll do, because unlike that time I tried to read Martin Chuzzlewit and subsequently forgot why I like reading in the first place, I'm not going to waste an entire month trying to get through something this bad.

First of all, the narrator, one Michael Kramer, sounds bored to tears. Just listening to his voice makes my mind wander. I tried listening to this book twice, and both times, I got about a half hour through it before I realized I had no idea what was going on, no idea who the characters were, and no idea what they were talking about. Worse yet, I didn't care. What I did catch was such typical fantasy that I'm surprised this book was published in 2006 and not 1990. The thought of trying to get through 24+ hours of this audiobook makes me want to drive into oncoming traffic--and there's six more books in the series. Oh God.

In short, there's no shame in giving up on a book. This book is not for me, and makes me really appreciate Audible's return policy.

Overall: 1 star
Amazon: Mistborn

More reviews: Mistborn on Librarything (Average 4.27 stars) (really?)
Mistborn on Goodreads (Average 4.40 stars) (really??)

Et tu, Robin Hobb?

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Uprooted - Naomi Novik

The second of my May new releases is Uprooted - yes, I'm still behind. The eternal state, it seems. Although I just received my preorder for my June release, so hopefully I can start that next, and get back on track.


US cover still the best cover.

Uprooted is a fairy tale at it's heart, and although still European-based, I can't fault it for that given the specificity with which Novik writes. I talked previously about a boredom with your typical Medieval-England based white fantasy, but Novik skirts these issues by drawing from Polish folklore and naming conventions. It makes it feel sufficiently "new" that it doesn't immediately ping my trope-dar, though I'll admit, I went into the story with reservations. I think Novik deliberately plays with our expectations of a fairy tale, starting with an unexpected heroine being chosen as a sacrifice to the Dragon. But as the story unravels it gets fuller, and richer, and much more enjoyable. The Dragon is really a wizard who lives in a tower near their villages, keeping watch over the mysterious Wood. The Wood itself is a central character and the primary villain, a mysterious and malevolent forest that steals villagers and corrupts them, sometimes sending them back to wreak havoc on the human world. Agnieszka is chosen as the 'sacrifice', a valley girl that the Dragon finds has an aptitude for magic, and she learns about her own power and how she can use it and work with the other wizards to save her friend Kasia, her valley, and even the entire kingdom.

I'm not wild about the romantic subplot between Agnieszka and the Dragon given their extreme age difference (hundred+ years yo) and their teacher-student power dynamic. I get that part of their story is overcoming that dynamic to emerge as peers, but it still leaves me with a squicky taste, especially when you add the trope of "woman fixes broken man and teaches him to love again". It works just fine for some people--just not my cup of tea. I think this book could have accomplished its goal without the romance at all, which would alleviate many fans' discomfort with their uncomfortable relationship.

I really like, however, the character of Kasia. Originally everyone thought she would be the girl that the Dragon chose--the prettiest, most graceful, most accomplished of all the Dragon-born girls. She prepared her whole life to leave her home to go to the tower, and by consequence her parents never really opened up to her in the same way they did to their other children, and it's no wonder that some resentment took root there. When she wasn't chosen, it was both a relief and a disappointment: what was she to do now? But the way Kasia ends up this brilliant, fierce, indestructible warrior woman--well, I just like that in a fairy tale. She's strong without resorting to being an unlikeable character. She only has to learn how to use her new strength and invulnerability to become a fearsome fighter.

Yet again, this is another new release where I've heard word of being optioned for film right away. So hooray! I wonder, though, if Novik isn't holding her breath, what with the Temeraire film 10 years in the making with no progress. Fantasy is an awfully big market for Hollywood right now, and they seem to be grabbing onto any book adaptation they can: I just want someone to follow through and actually make them into good films that deserve the same title.

Overall, I enjoyed this book a lot. Novik's writing style is unobtrusive and flows well, and I especially enjoy how she articulates things that are hard to articulate, like how Agnieszka uses her magic. It's all very vague, but it still has a certain internal logic, and it works very well in this book. I would not recommend this book for children, despite the fairy tale label, what with the sex scene and all. But it could fly for YA and any adult fantasy lover just fine.

He spent the next hour interrogating me as to every particular of how I had cast the spell, growing ever more upset: I could scarcely answer any of his questions. He wanted exact syllables and repetitions, he wanted to know how close I had been to his arm, he wanted the number of rosemary twigs and the number of peels. I did my best to tell him, but I felt even as I did so that it was all wrong, and finally I blurted out, as he wrote angrily on his sheets, "But none of that matters at all." His head raised to stare balefully at me, but I said, incoherent yet convinced, "It's just--a way to go. There's ins't only one way to go." I waved at his notes. "You're trying to find a road where there isn't one. It's like--it's gleaning in the woods," I said abruptly. "You have to pick your way through the thickets and the trees, and it's different every time."

Overall: 5 stars
Amazon: Uprooted

More reviews: Uprooted on Librarything (Average 4.29 stars)
Uprooted on Goodreads (Average 4.32 stars)


Monday, June 15, 2015

Red Seas Under Red Skies - Scott Lynch

I feel like a real theme of my reading choices lately are those with film or television adaptations. As I finish the second book of Scott Lynch's Gentleman Bastards series, I find out that the first was optioned by Warner Brothers all the way back in 2006. Whatever happened? Where's the promised adaptation? Same thing happened with Naomi Novik's Temeraire series. Peter Jackson picked up the rights nearly a decade ago now, and nothing's ever come of it. Stop playing with my heart, Hollywood. It's cruel to tease me this way.

Sometimes I just want to find some cool art to include to break up a wall of text.

Red Seas Under Red Skies picks up where The Lies of Locke Lamora left off, with Jean and Locke fleeing the city of Camorr (As always, forgive any errs in spelling, as I only know these names phonetically!). There's a lot of emotional fallout for the pair to deal with, but eventually they pick up their games again in Tal Verrar. Naturally, as is the case with the stories of Locke Lamora, everything falls to shit when someone decides to start messing with their lives. The Archon of Tal Verrar tricks the pair into drinking a poison that places them in his power, and they must do his bidding for him to give them the antidote to keep the poison at bay every eight weeks. Locke takes on the new identity of a rogue ship captain--I cannot find the spelling to save my life--and 'steals' one of the Archon's ships (with the Archon's blessing, obvs), with the goal of hazing Tal Verrar and forcing the people of the city to turn to the Archon for protection. But--surprise!--their plan falls to shit too. These books are like the definition of putting your characters up trees and throwing rocks at them.

Like the first book, I listened to this as an audiobook from Audible. Again, the narrator is great, but I find that Lynch's intricate timeline braiding limits this book's effectiveness as an audiobook: I got lost a lot. We jump around between various points in time--from Locke's depression after leaving Camorr, to a stint in a town centered around a brutal slave fighting game, to their current time in Tal Verrar and on the Sea of Brass. I suspect that had I been reading the book the delineations between times would be clearer. As much as I like the technique of plot braiding, this might be a caution against getting too complex.

Back to the concept of throwing rocks at your characters: Lynch gives poor Jean Tannen a scant few weeks of happiness in love before cruelly ripping it away when Ezri dies most dramatically. Now, the husband and I have a terrible habit of coming up with 'corrections' to plots that we think would make them better, and I'm going to indulge myself here. This part of the plot feels really hokey to me, in a "we end the book exactly where we started" kind of way. You know how (bad) sitcoms wrap up that week's storyline by the end of the show in a nicely contained box that doesn't effect any other episode's continuity? It's dissatisfying because it feels like the characters aren't really changing.

So I put this idea forth that, if someone had to die, why not Jean himself? I feel like there was a huge opportunity there for an interesting dynamic. Ezri was a really fascinating character--a daughter of nobility who ran off to become a pirate, a damn good fighter, and angry. I have a huge soft spot for angry women characters. Both Ezri and Locke deeply love Jean (yes, in different ways, doesn't change the depth) and, say, if Jean had made them both promise to watch out for the other, because he saw the depths of depression Locke went into when the rest of their brothers were killed, etc. we could have found this really fascinating dynamic of a pair continuing their game while simultaneously despising each other. Each would be the other's only link to Jean, and therefore a kind of bittersweet partner that they might cling to despite the pain and irritation. A mutual respect could grow of that. And, I'll admit, I would enjoy messing with anyone's automatic expectation that they should become romantically involved, because I could see both characters answering "What? Ew, no!" if the question were raised.

But that's not what happened, so eh. Kill your darlings, I say. Don't let your love for a character keep them around when it would be a better plot choice to dump them.

The other plot point I wondered about was Stragos' poison. I had this inkling early on that the poison was a red herring, but it never came to fruit. What if there was no poison at all? Locke makes his living on deceiving people with words and actions, wouldn't it be nice to see the same played on him? I kept waiting for the end reveal, especially after the alchemist was killed and no more antidotes were to be had, but we ended on this cliffhanger of "will Locke die?" Well, obviously we know he won't die, it's his series. So maybe that is the reveal and it'll happen in the next book, but it would have been a fun moment for a reader if it had actually been revealed.

I feel like I really could keep on talking about this book for ages, but I'll wrap it up with a note on Lynch's dialogue. I like swearing. I like swearing a lot. So I really enjoy reading a book where the swearing is natural and fits in context, and honestly, it makes Lynch's dialogue pretty funny and on point. As a whole I think he's pretty great at dialogue, with or without swearing, because the quips always make me laugh. On a whole, though, this book suffers from pacing. It felt like the longest audiobook of my life.

"I also do a brisk trade in putting knives to peoples throats and shouting at them."

Jean grinned down at her, and she handed him something in a small silk bag.
"What's this?"
"Lock of my hair," she said. "Meant to give it to you days ago, but we got busy with all the raiding. You know. Piracy. Hectic life."
"Thank you, love," he said.
"Now, if you find yourself in trouble wherever you go, you can hold up that little bag to whoever's bothering you, and you can say, 'You have no idea who you're fucking with. I'm under the protection of the lady who gave me this object of her favour.'"
"And that's supposed to make them stop?"
"Shit no, that's just to confuse them. Then you kill them while they're standing there looking at you funny."
Overall: 3.5 stars

More reviews: Red Seas Under Red Skies on Librarything (Average 4.05 stars)


Tuesday, June 9, 2015

The Book of Phoenix - Nnedi Okorafor

The internet-o-sphere has been abuzz lately about diversity in fantasy and science fiction. It's a valid concern for sure: for over a century both genres have been dominated by white men, and the worlds they create reflect not only their time but their culture. How many fantasy stories are based on medieval Europe and all that goes along with that, including subjugation of women, feudal/monarchy systems of government and absence/tokenism of minorities? It stands to reason that if we approach these genres from outside of that perspective, we'll get new, fresh, incredibly interesting worlds that may resonate with readers who have never been able to see themselves in these traditional narratives.

Nnedi Okorafor is an outspoken proponent of fantasy diversity, and her books work to fill that void as well. Previously I was introduced to her post-apocalyptic African-based book Who Fears Death via a college course, but I realized I had a copy of her short story collection Kabu Kabu on my shelf already. And once I got into them? I was hooked. This is a fantasy I hadn't seen before.

Great art, too.

The Book of Phoenix, released this May, is a prequel to Who Fears Death. We listen to the story of Phoenix Okore, a genetically engineered woman who burns like a sun and rises from her ashes. She escapes from the tower where she's been contained for the first few years of her life (she ages dramatically fast, and is only three for the majority of the book, though she appears around 40) and, over the course of the book, discovers more about what the people who kept her captive have done to her, her birth mother, her genetic siblings, and her friends and lover, all of whom are of African descent. It's a kind of 'let my people go' quest, only Phoenix holds nothing back. She's willing to destroy everything to achieve justice.

Okorafor's worldbuilding is always a pleasure. I really enjoyed how she tied this story, not only to Who Fears Death but also to one of her short stories, Spider the Artist (which, incidentally, can be read online at Lightspeed Magazine). The anansi droids, spider-like robots, guard the Nigerian oil lines, but become too dangerous to be around people. In The Book of Phoenix, they're spotted by Phoenix swimming through the ocean, having left Nigeria. We don't know their exact intentions, but it's certainly ominous. Are they looking for more humans to kill? Are these machines programmed to hate the human race? It's a small commentary on how AI has the potential to get away from us. You can also see how these droids, and the atrocities committed by the Big Eye towers, could contribute to a mythology in Who Fears Death where humans were punished for their technological sins.

In fact, that's really the basis of the story. The Book of Phoenix is constructing the mythology of the Great Book in Who Fears Death. It's all very interconnected, and fascinating for that.

It's something to note, too, exactly how important race is to this story. I think a lot of fantasy and science fiction, when attempting to be diverse, makes race incidental to the character. And in some settings, that could make perfect sense. A fantasy world without out our particular societal baggage, I could see skin color being incidental to a character's personality. But in many others, it seems like either a mistake or a missed opportunity. Our race--though a construct created entirely by our perceptions--does have an effect on who we are. We can see that effect in the Book of Phoenix, in every African character, that their heritage is an integral part of the character and shapes how they move and talk and react and even how they see each other and how others see them. This is what I mean when I say making race incidental is a missed opportunity: there's an extra dimension to these characters because of how they interact with the world, influenced by their race.

I think this can be something hard for white authors to understand. Is this what leads authors to make entirely white casts? Or, sometimes, token characters with racial signifiers, that maybe have no bearing on the character's development? White authors certainly CAN write characters of color effectively, but I think it takes a level of commitment to writing authentically and trying to understand the experiences of someone not like yourself. But ultimately, I think it's going to be most important to continue to push for diversity in publishing, in race and sexual identity and ability. Those are the authors that are going to be giving us the deepest truths about these experiences. I say this as a white author who, still, will try to find my own place in the industry and do my best to contribute to the solutions, not the problems.

As always, your mileage may vary. All I can say is I like the focus that #weneeddiversebooks is getting, and I hope that it continues.

"Phoenix," she said. Hearing my name come from her lips made me feel stronger. "I birthed you all on my lonesome. They cleared out soon as I was in labor. They left me in that building, talked to me by portable. They were sure you'd blow up...or something. But you came out alive, eyes all open. Glowing like a little sun--orange under ebony brown. Brownest newborn I ever saw. I held you." She shut her eyes and she held my hand. She opened her eyes and looked intensely into mine. "I held you. They come back when they knew it was safe. Took you from me! They'd promised me I could raise you! That you'd be mine." She breathed heavily, wheezing and coughing.
"Easy," I whispered, patting her on the back.
"They classified you as a 'dangerous non-human person'. That's how they justified taking you from me like that. But then, what's that make me?" She coughed again, weaker. "Phoenix, give 'em hell. You hear me girl? Give 'em hell."

Overall: 5 stars



Monday, June 8, 2015

The Giver - Lois Lowry

I've been digging into books from my childhood again lately, to mixed success. Some failed miserably to live up to my memories (Redwall, Pern, among others), but others, the ones that I think are truly remarkable, hold up well. The Giver is a great example of that. Though maybe better known to today's audiences as a exceedingly subpar movie adaptation, Lowry's original book was published in 1993 and was awarded multiple honors, including the 1994 Newberry Medal.

Hollywood always gotta insert romance into a story that doesn't have one and doesn't NEED one.

The Giver was perhaps dystopian fiction before dystopian fiction became a thing. It takes place in an implied future, where every aspect of life as we know it today has been changed: hills don't exist, because they interfered with shipping and travel. Weather doesn't exist, because it interferes with the efficiencies of life. Sunlight doesn't exist. Color doesn't exist. Everyone is herded through early life in groups according to their birthyear, and they explore the same milestones together, learning about interdependence and the importance of community cohesiveness. Careers are assigned to them based on their aptitudes, spouses are assigned based on compatibility. Sex doesn't exist, children are born by birthmothers and assigned to family units. Rules are paramount. Rules are what keeps the community existing.

Enter Jonas, who approaches his twelfth year ceremony with apprehension, the year everyone gets their career assignments. The community is shocked when he is assigned to be the Receiver of Memory. Jonas learns about how the previous Receiver, now the Giver, holds the memories of the time before, meant to remember all the hardships that all these extraneous things brought them, and advise the community when questions arise that would bring the state of their community into jeopardy.

 I wouldn't say it's an overly complicated plot or anything, and yes, we see this idea of sameness=bad, freedom to make our choices=good, etc. in other works, but I think it's important to consider first, the time that this was published, and second, the audience. This book came out before our latest glut of science fiction and dystopian young adult works, so really, a lot of the work we're seeing now is really sampling from what Lowry wrote. For example, Divergent uses the same trope of "This categorizing isn't LIVING! Freeeeeedooooom!" -- only executed a lot poorer. But also, this is children's fiction, possibly middle grade by today's publishing standards. You don't want a middle grade book to be TOO far above the audience's heads, which this book is not. The writing is easy to understand and digest.What makes Lowry's writing so much higher quality is the fact that while easy to understand, it's still challenging for that age group, and really gives them something to think about in terms of what they might want society to look like in the future

There's not a whole lot I can take away from this from a technical standpoint, because I don't think that middle grade will be my genre of choice, but I like having the example of what's appropriate for that age group. If that was something I wanted to explore at some point, The Giver would certainly be a decent example to emulate, as far as word choice and sentence structure.

One thing I found interesting is how Lowry emphasized the characters that have distinctively light-colored eyes: Jonas, the Giver, and the previous Receiver all do; as well as Gabe, the newchild that Jonas's family is caring for. There's also a female Six that Jonas mentions has the same eyes. They mention that the Birthmothers only bear three children in three years and then retire, so it's not possible that all there could have the same birthmother, but I do wonder if they're related somehow. It makes it seem like the ability to give and receive these memories (which Gabe can also do) is somehow related to their genetics. Perhaps the community has a store of sperm? I wonder how they would replenish that supply, given that every male in the community takes the pills that remove all sexual desire?

Additionally, it's never really explained how the memories 'escape' and return to the community. When Rosemary was released/died, her memories just flew out and everyone had a piece of them. It's heavily implied that Jonas and Gabe die, but they make it seem as if they believe just leaving the community will release those memories back. How does that work? They pass some special line on the ground and lose those memories? It's not like there aren't other communities in the world, they specifically mention groups of visiting children from Elsewhere. I guess I just wonder at some of the logistics of this world that Lowry didn't explore, because from an adult perspective it doesn't necessarily make sense. Which isn't the point of the book at all, so it's okay to not explore that--I'm just that kind of annoying reader, I guess.

Incidentally, I have only now learned, twenty years later, that there's a Giver series and now I must read the others. Maybe my questions will be answered!

"But now that I can see colors, at least sometimes, I was just thinking: What if we could hold up things that were bright red, or bright yellow, and he could choose? Instead of the Sameness."
"He might make wrong choices."
"Oh." Jonas was silent for a minute. "Oh, I see what you mean. It wouldn't matter for a newchild's toy. But later it does matter, doesn't it? We don't dare to let people make choices of their own."
"Not safe?" The Giver suggested.
"Definitely not safe," Jonas said with certainty. "What if they were allowed to choose their own mate? And chose wrong?"Or what if," he went on, almost laughing at the absurdity, "they chose their own jobs?"
"Frightening, isn't it?" The Giver said.
Jonas chuckled. "Very frightening. I can't even imagine it. We really have to protect people from wrong choices."
"It's safer."
"Yes," Jonas agreed. "Much safer."
But when the conversation turned to other things, Jonas was left, still, with a feeling of frustration that he didn't understand.

 Overall: 5 stars
Amazon: The Giver

More reviews: The Giver on Librarything (Average 4.2 stars)
The Giver on Goodreads(Average 4.11 stars)


Wednesday, June 3, 2015

A Breath of Snow and Ashes - Diana Gabaldon

The second half of Outlander season 1 winds to a close--really, Starz did a pretty tidy job of containing an entire book in one season. They cut away exactly the right amount of material to make it work. The second season is already planned, based on Dragonfly in Amber, the second book.

Never have I loathed a character as much as Jack Randall. Can't wait till we see him again.

I'm way ahead, though: Breath of Snow and Ashes is the sixth book in the series that I'm just finishing up. It's been a long time since any of the main characters have seen Scotland. The focus is still primarily on Fraser's Ridge, much like the previous book. The number of residents of the ridge have steadily grown larger, especially after a number of new tenants from Scotland move in. Naturally, the new tenants are protestant, and see the Catholic Jamie as nothing short of the devil, but a protestant by the name of Tom Christie and Jamie's son-in-law Roger help bridge the gap as much as possible. Galbadon continues to emphasize the danger inherent in this time period, what with the war rapidly approaching and roaming bands of men who attack Claire and Marsali when they're out alone. Claire is kidnapped, beaten and raped--at least, until Jamie (et al) comes to save her.

There's an awful lot of rape in these books, I have to say. On the one hand, it's plausible that there really would be this constant threat to women in this time, what with being pretty much defenseless and property and all. But on the other hand, it seems we can't go more than ten chapters without somebody being at least threatened with rape. It's starting to feel like a repetitive and slightly cheap way to drive up the tension. At least it's equal-opportunity rape (what with Jamie and Randall), but still.

So, partly because Claire used her reputation as a witch/healer to fend off the men of this dangerous band, and partly because of her actual healing skill and refusal to conform to many standards of the time (no cap please!) the residents of the ridge begin to regard her as a devil woman. When Marsali's next child is born a dwarf tensions just run higher, because clearly, that's the devil's work right there. The McGillivray's start to shun Claire when she informs them that their son Manfred has syphilis (the pox), and they shame her for slander. Then Malva Christie--who Claire regarded as her protege--names Jamie the father of her unborn child and is later found murdered in Claire's arms, after Claire attempted to cut her child from her dead body (obviously she didn't murder her, but that's not how most of their people see it).

Basically, bad luck and modern decisions keep getting Claire in a world of hurt, and Jamie has to keep hunting her down to save her. When we're not saving Claire, we're saving Brianna, kidnapped by Stephen Bonnet. Again, I feel that I can possibly chalk this up to the time period, but after six books it gets a little old with all the your-princess-is-in-another-castle and here-comes-the-rape-train. While I still like the series (and $5/book for kindle makes it easy to keep going) it's not quite got that same hook into my heart that the first book did.

Writing-wise, we're seeing a lot of the meandering plotline that we saw in the previous books. I still think this is an interesting tactic, where you literally cannot sum up the plot in a sentence. It's more this-happens-then-this-which-leads-to-this than it is one central question. At the Writers in Paradise conference we talked about the concept of a central narrative question, and how it strengthens writing. The pieces that did the best in our workshop were the pieces that had a very strong question, and Mr. Watson emphasized that the strongest is phrased as: Will Character1 Blank Character2?

Now, a short story will probably only have one question, or one large question and a few small ones. But a novel might have one really big question (for example re: Outlander book 1, will Claire stay with Jamie?), it's got to have a metric ton of smaller questions of varying sizes. This series interests me because it doesn't have one central question for many of these books, but a series of plotlines weaving in and around each other. We might say that the main unifying plotline in this book is the degeneration of the Fraser's standing among the families of the ridge as war approaches, but there's many smaller plotlines woven together around it that contribute to their downfall. So it's difficult to summarize this book accurately and I like that. It indicates a level of complexity that's very intriguing.

So I guess it shows that, done right, you can actually avoid that central question, but it's still something to keep in mind for us newer writers. Like the rules of grammar and punctuation, maybe you should know how to use them properly before you start disregarding them.

“Couldn’t be simpler,” I assured him. “I do a process called fecal sedimentation to concentrate the stool, then look for the eggs under the microscope.”
He nodded, plainly not following. I smiled kindly at him.
 “All you have to do, Bobby, is shit.”
His face was a study in doubt and apprehension.
“If it’s all the same to you, mum,” he said, “I think I’ll keep the worms.”

Real danger had its own taste, vivid as lemon juice, by contrast with the weak lemonade of imagination.

“I’m so sorry, Mrs. Fraser,” she whispered, tears trembling becomingly on her lashes. “He— we— we didna mean to hurt ye.”
I watched with interest from somewhere outside my body, as my arm lifted and drew back, and felt a sense of vague approval as my hand struck her cheek with enough force that she stumbled backward, tripped over a stool, and fell, her petticoats tumbled up to her waist in a froth of linen, wool- stockinged legs sticking absurdly up in the air.
“Can’t say the same, I’m afraid.” I hadn’t even thought of saying anything, and was surprised to feel the words in my mouth, cool and round as river stones.
Overall: 4 stars

More reviews: A Breath of Snow and Ashes on Librarything (Average 4.26 stars)